4.1 Article

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Reduce Cigarette Smoke-Induced Inflammation and Airflow Obstruction in Rats via TGF-β1 Signaling

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2014.898032

关键词

inflammation; mesenchymal stem cell; transforming growth factor-beta 1

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [12431900701]
  2. Youth Project of Shanghai Municipal Public Health Bureau [2009Y024]
  3. State Natural Sciences Foundation Project [81000014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cigarette smoke has been shown to cause chronic inflammation of the lungs, eventually leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Additionally, recent studies have suggested that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can mediate local inflammatory responses in the lungs. Thus, the aim of the present study was to test the effects of rat MSCs (rMSCs) on inflammation of the lungs and destructive pulmonary function induced by cigarette smoke in rats. Rats were exposed to cigarette smoke for 7 weeks. rMSCs were cultured in vitro and infused intratracheally into cigarette smoke-exposed rats. The total and differential cell counts in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), histological changes, proinflammatory cytokines, transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) expression, and pulmonary function were evaluated. Additionally, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and human MSCs were cocultured in vitro to detect cytokines and TGF-beta 1 levels. We found that rMSC administration resulted in downregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the lungs while increasing TGF-beta 1 expression, reducing total inflammatory cell numbers in the BALF, and improving pulmonary histopathology and airflow obstruction. Coculture revealed that human MSCs mediated an anti-inflammatory effect partly via upregulation of TGF-beta 1. These findings suggested that MSCs may have therapeutic potential in cigarette smoke-induced inflammation and airflow obstruction, partly via upregulation of TGF-beta 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据