4.1 Article

Cardiovascular Safety of QVA149, a Combination of Indacaterol and NVA237, in COPD Patients

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2010.528812

关键词

-

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Menarini
  4. Schering-Plough
  5. Chiesi Farmaceutici
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Merck Sharp
  8. Dohme
  9. Nycomed
  10. Union Chimique Belge
  11. Pfizer
  12. Sigma-Tau
  13. Italian Ministry of Health
  14. Italian Ministry for University and Research
  15. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
  16. Medtronics
  17. Glaxo Smith Kline
  18. Astra Zeneca
  19. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the cardiovascular safety of QVA149, an inhaled, once daily, bronchodilator combination containing two 24-hour bronchodilators, the long-acting beta(2)-agonist indacaterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium (NVA237). In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 257 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were randomised to receive QVA149 (indacaterol/NVA237) 600/100 mu g, 300/100 mu g or 150/100 mu g, indacaterol 300 mu g or placebo, once daily for 14 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in 24-h mean heart rate versus placebo on Day 14. 255 patients were included in the safety analysis (mean age 63.8 years, 76.5% male, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] 53.2% predicted, FEV1/FVC [forced vital capacity] 50.0%, mean 24-h heart rate 79.6 bpm). There were no clinically significant differences in the 24-h mean heart rate on Day 14 between the three doses of QVA149 and placebo or indacaterol. The confidence intervals of these treatment differences (contrasts) were within the pre-specified equivalence limit (-5 to 5 bpm). No clinically relevant differences in QTc interval (Fridericia's) were observed between groups on Days 1, 7 and 14. Once-daily QVA149 was well tolerated in COPD patients with a cardiovascular safety profile and overall adverse event rates similar to placebo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据