4.8 Review

Redox and environmentally relevant aspects of actinide(IV) coordination chemistry

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 266, 期 -, 页码 171-193

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.021

关键词

Actinides; Actinide(IV); Coordination chemistry; Biogeochemistry; Redox chemistry

资金

  1. EPSRC (UK)
  2. University of Manchester
  3. EPSRC [EP/G004846/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G004846/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The redox chemistry of the actinide elements plays a central role in many aspects of nuclear fission technology including the reprocessing of spent fuel, safe disposal strategies and in the ability to reliably predict the mobility of actinides in natural and engineered environmental conditions. In both aqueous and non-aqueous conditions, the redox chemistry of the actinides can be complicated and diverse and speciation is governed by both the actinide in question and many environmental factors. Although, historically, actinyl(VI) and (V) ions have been the subject of the most in depth research, the study of actinide ions in the +IV oxidation state (principally for U, Np and Pu) is inherently important in governing speciation in all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle. Importantly, reactions involving reduction, disproportionation and re-oxidation tend to involve actinide ions in the +IV oxidation state leading to complex systems particularly in aqueous solution that control the solubility and migratory behaviour of actinide containing species. In this review, we focus on recent developments in the coordination and redox chemistry of the actinides involving actinide(IV) species in terms of fundamental coordination chemical studies, mineral chemistry, biogeochemistry and the implications of hydrolysis chemistry on the chemical and physical behaviour of actinide(IV) ions in the natural and engineered environment. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据