4.8 Review

Functional materials with high-efficiency energy storage and conversion for batteries and fuel cells

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 253, 期 23-24, 页码 2805-2813

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.04.008

关键词

Functional materials; Batteries; Fuel cells; Energy storage and conversion; High efficiency

资金

  1. Programs of National NSFC [50631020, 50771056, 20873071]
  2. Tianjin Basic Research [08JCZDJC21300]
  3. [2005CB623607]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical energy storage and conversion with high efficiency and cleanliness is unquestionably one challenge for the sustainable development of the society of human beings. The functional materials can be applied in the systems of electrochemical energy storage and conversion such as in the fields of batteries and fuel cells. For the aspect of energy storage, high efficiency is closely connected with lightweight and high energy density materials, such as hydrogen, lithium, and magnesium. While for energy conversion, two major problems exist namely the diffusion/migration of ions and the transportation of electrons. The properties of the corresponding materials directly affect the solution of these challenges. Thus, in this review we concentrate on the crystal structures and the properties of functional materials applied in electrochemical energy storage and conversion systems with selected primary and secondary batteries and hydrogen fuel cells. In particular, the design, synthesis, structure and property of the materials, containing (1) cathode, anode and electrolyte for non-aqueous Li/Li+; (2) various Mg, MgxMo6S8 (0 < x < 2) Chevrel phase cathode and electrolyte solutions for primary and secondary Mg batteries; (3) proton exchange membranes, electrode catalysts, hydrogen production and storage for aqueous H-2(H)/H+ fuel cells. The advantages and disadvantages involved in the batteries and fuel cells using functional materials are also discussed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据