4.8 Review

Reflections on small molecule manganese models that seek to mimic photosynthetic water oxidation chemistry

期刊

COORDINATION CHEMISTRY REVIEWS
卷 252, 期 3-4, 页码 416-443

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.07.021

关键词

manganyl; S-state; oxidation; ligand

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM039406-19, R01 GM039406] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in the study of the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) of photosystem II (PSII) include structural information attained from several X-ray crystallographic (XRD) and spectroscopic (XANES and EXAFS) investigations. The possible structural features gleaned from these studies have enabled synthetic chemists to design more accurate model complexes, which in turn, offer better insight into the possible pathways used by PSII to drive photosynthetic water oxidation catalysis. Mononuclear model compounds have been used to advance the knowledge base regarding the physical properties and reactivity of high-valent (Mn-IV or Mn-V) complexes. Such investigations have been especially important in regard to the manganyl (Mn-IV=O or Mn-V(O) species, as there are no reports, to date, of any structurally characterized multinuclear model compounds that incorporate such a functionality. Dinuclear and trinuclear model compounds have also been thoroughly studied in attempts to draw further comparison to the physical properties observed in the natural system and to design systems of catalytic relevance. As the reactive center of the OEC has been shown to contain an oxo-Mn4Ca cluster, exact structural models necessitate a tetranuclear Mn core. The number of models that make use of Mn-4 clusters has risen substantially in recent years, and these models have provided evidence to support and refute certain mechanistic proposals. Further work is needed to adequately address the rationale for Ca (and Cl) in the OEC and to determine the sequence of events that lead to O-2 evolution. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据