4.5 Article

Microlite transfer by disaggregation of mafic inclusions following magma mixing at SoufriSre Hills volcano, Montserrat

期刊

CONTRIBUTIONS TO MINERALOGY AND PETROLOGY
卷 157, 期 5, 页码 609-624

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-008-0356-3

关键词

Magma mixing; Mafic inclusions; Microlites; Hybridisation; Disaggregation; Soufriere Hills volcano; Montserrat

资金

  1. Junior Research Fellowship at Trinity College, University of Cambridge
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs04002] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [bgs04002] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SoufriSre Hills volcano on Montserrat has for the past 12 years been erupting andesite with basaltic to basaltic-andesite inclusions. The andesite contains a wide variety of phenocryst textures and strongly zoned microlites. Analysis of minor elements in both phenocrysts and microlites allows us to put detailed constraints on their origins. Compositions of clinopyroxene, from overgrowth rims on quartz and orthopyroxene and coarse-grained breakdown rims on hornblende, are identical to those from the mafic inclusions, indicating that these rims form during interaction with mafic magma. In contrast, resorbed quartz and reversely zoned orthopyroxenes form during heating. Microlites of plagioclase and orthopyroxene are chemically distinct from the phenocrysts, being enriched in Fe and Mg, and Al and Ca respectively. However, microlites of plagioclase, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene are indistinguishable from the compositions of these phases in the mafic inclusions. We infer that the inclusions disaggregated under conditions of high shear stress during ascent in the conduit, transferring mafic material into the andesite groundmass. The mafic component of the system is therefore greater than previously thought. The presence of mafic-derived microlites in the andesite groundmass also means that care must be taken when using this as a starting material for phase equilibrium experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据