4.5 Article

Influence of the organic matter composition on benthic oxygen demand in the Rhone River prodelta (NW Mediterranean Sea)

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1008-1019

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2011.03.007

关键词

Organic matter; Oxygen consumption rates; Rhone River; Carbon mineralization; Coastal sediments

资金

  1. French national ANR [ANR-VULN-06-001-01]
  2. French INSU-EC2CO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Measurements of diffusive (DOU) and total (IOU) sediment oxygen uptakes, oxygen penetration depth, porosity, OC, TN, carbohydrate. lipid, amino acid, chlorophyll a and pheophytin a concentrations were assessed in surface sediments at 9 stations located in the Rhone River prodelta and the adjacent continental shelf during April 2007 (a period characterized by low flow and discharge regimes). Our results show that sedimentary organics in the Rhone River prodelta were mainly fueled by a single source of OM, namely continental inputs. Those inputs were relatively labile and decreased following an inshore-offshore gradient. The descriptors of sedimentary organics mostly resulted from dilution and degradation processes affecting OM during its transfer from the mouth of the Rhone River. TOU/DOU ratios were close to one, with a slight increase at offshore stations. This is coherent with the limitation of bioirrigation in response to organic enrichment. DOU correlated best with bulk quantitative descriptors of sedimentary organics, which probably resulted from the overall correlation between all biochemical descriptors linked with the predominance of a single source of organic matter in the whole studied area. Nevertheless, an influence of Chl a and Pheo a contents on oxygen consumptions, possibly due to freshwater or/and marine primary production, is not to be excluded. These small fractions ( < 0.08%. to total OM) could then be responsible for the oxygen consumption, even if not visible in classical measurements as delta 13C or C/N. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据