4.5 Article

Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing in a subtropical coastal upwelling system in the Taiwan Strait

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 S48-S56

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2011.02.005

关键词

Phytoplankton growth; Microzooplankton grazing; Coastal upwelling; Microbial loop; Taiwan Strait

资金

  1. China NSF [40730846, 40821063, 40925018]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006CB400604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing were measured in a coastal upwelling system in the southern Taiwan Strait during the summers of 2004-2007, with emphasis on a comparison between upwelling and non-upwelling areas. Diatoms significantly dominated the phytoplankton community (49-92%, by pigment content) in the coastal upwelling area, while the prevailing groups varied, with Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae and diatoms, in the different stations of the non-upwelling area. Aloricate ciliates and tintinnids dominated the microzooplankton community, and there was a higher abundance of microzooplankton in the coastal upwelling area (1869 ind L-1), while there was lower abundance in the non-upwelling area (544 ind L-1). The phytoplankton growth rate in the upwelling area (1.02 +/- 0.27 d(-1)) was significantly higher than that in the non-upwelling area (0.51 +/- 0.05 d(-1)) (p < 0.05), while the microzooplankton grazing rate in the upwelling area (0.85 +/- 0.37 d(-1)) was only a little higher than that in the non-upwelling area (0.50 +/- 0.17 d(-1)). Growth (synthesis) rates were similar among the four representative pigments, while grazing (destruction) rates were higher for 19'-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin than those for fucoxanthin, zeaxanthin and divinyl chlorophyll a. In addition, there was almost a balance between phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing in the non-upwelling area, while phytoplankton growth was higher than grazing in most cases in the upwelling area. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据