4.4 Article

Exogenous melatonin does not improve the freezability of Blanca Andaluza goat semen over exposure to two months of short days

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 157, 期 -, 页码 24-32

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.03.010

关键词

Melatonin; Photoperiod; Semen cryopreservation; Bucks

资金

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias-Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (I.N.I.A.-C.I.C.Y.T., Spain) [RZ2010-00001-00-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper compares the effects of exposure to exogenous melatonin (MEL), short days (SD, 8 h of light) and long days (LD, 16 h of light), on reproductive activity, sperm motility and other reproductive variables, in Blanca Andaluza bucks. Fourteen males were spilt into two groups of seven animals (G1 and G2). They were subjected to five alternations of 2 months of LD followed by 2 months of SD or MEL before the experimental period of three consecutive intervals of: (1) 2 months of SD (G1,N=7) or MEL (G2, N=7); (2) 2 months of LD (G1 + G2, N=14); and (3) 2 months of SD (G2, N=7) or MEL (G1, N=7). Plasma testosterone concentration, live weight, testicular weight and fresh semen quality were determined weekly. Semen was also cooled and frozen-thawed every fortnight, and the same quality variables measured as for fresh sperm. When the bucks were under LD treatment, the testosterone concentration was lower than when under MEL or SD treatment (P<0.01); values for the semen concentration and total number of sperm per ejaculate were also higher (P<0.001). No differences were observed between the MEL and SD treatments in terms of fresh, cooled or frozen-thawed sperm quality. Only some quality variables on fresh semen were improved by MEL and SD treatment (P<0.05). In conclusion the results of the present experiment showed that MEL improved the fresh semen motility variables, but this did not improve the motility of frozen-thawed sperm over that recorded for either SD or LD treatment. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据