4.6 Article

Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, antimicrobial activity and crystal structure of [Ag2(C10H10N3O3S)2(C5H5N)3]

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1088, 期 -, 页码 161-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.02.014

关键词

Ag complex; Sulfamethoxazole; Spectroscopic analysis; Crystal structure; Thermogravimetric study; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. DST- FIST, New Delhi
  2. UGC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silver complex of 4-Amino-N-(5-methyl-1,2-oxazol-3-yl)benzenesulfonamide (sulfamethoxazole) (SMX) has been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, infrared, UV and NMR spectroscopy. The title compound, [Ag-2(C10H10N3O3S)(2)(C5H5N)(3)] crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pna2(1) with lattice parameters a = 17.9527(5), b = 8.6529(3), c= 25.1621(7) angstrom and Z = 4. The structure is solved by direct method and refined to a final R = 0.0567 for 6732 reflections with I >= 2 sigma(I). The results of IR, H-1 NMR and C-13 NMR spectral data suggest the binding of silver atom to the sulfonamide ligand which is in agreement with the crystal structure determination. X-ray analysis revealed that in the title compound, one silver atom is surrounded by three N atoms and one Ag atom leading to a distorted tetrahedral geometry and another silver atom is surrounded by four N atoms and one Ag atom leading to a slightly distorted square pyramid geometry with Ag. -Ag separation distance of 3.026 angstrom. The dihedral angle between phenyl and isoxazole ring is 85.7(4)degrees. In the crystal structure, the molecules are linked via N-H center dot center dot center dot O, C-H center dot center dot center dot O intermolecular and C-H center dot center dot center dot O intramolecular interactions. Silver complex of sulfamethoxazole has been studied by electrical and thermal analysis. Silver sulfamethoxazole presents different antibacterial behavior against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus strains. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据