4.5 Article

Classification of hand eczema: clinical and aetiological types. Based on the guideline of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group

期刊

CONTACT DERMATITIS
卷 65, 期 1, 页码 13-21

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01911.x

关键词

disease classification; hand eczema severity index; non-specific dermatitis; quality of life

资金

  1. Foundation for Professional Development in Private Practice, Danish Regions (Fonden for Faglig Udvikling af Special-laegepraksis, Danske Regioner)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. No generally accepted classification scheme for hand eczema exists. The Danish Contact Dermatitis Group recently developed a guideline defining common clinical types and providing criteria for aetiological types. Objectives. To test the concepts of this guideline in a group of hand eczema patients. Methods. Seven hundred and ten hand eczema patients were included from seven dermatology clinics in Denmark. The hand eczema was classified into one of five clinical types, with standard photographs as reference. The severity was scored by the physician, who also made a final aetiological diagnosis. Results. Irritant contact dermatitis was most frequent in chronic, dry fissured hand eczema (44.3%), pulpitis (41.7%), and nummular hand eczema (40.9%), whereas allergic contact dermatitis dominated in vesicular types of hand eczema, with recurrent (35%) and few (24.2%) eruptions. Hyperkeratotic palmar hand eczema was the only clinical type that constituted a distinct subgroup; it was found most frequently in older men and had the strongest relationship, although not significant, with non-specific dermatitis. Conclusions. The relationship between clinical type of hand eczema and aetiological diagnosis fitted with general experience, but no simple relationship was found. This emphasizes that patch testing and exposure analysis are mandatory. Hyperkeratotic palmar hand eczema was identified as a distinct clinical subtype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据