4.7 Article

3D meso-scale modelling of foamed concrete based on X-ray Computed Tomography

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 583-598

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.085

关键词

Foamed concrete; X-ray computed tomography; Mesa-scale modelling; XCT based modelling; Damage plasticity model

资金

  1. University of Melbourne
  2. ARC Centre for Advanced Manufacturing of Prefabricated Housing (ARC Grant) [IC150100023]
  3. Trace Analysis for Chemical, Earth and Environmental Sciences (TrACEES) platform from the Melbourne Collaborative Infrastructure Research Program at the University of Melbourne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Foamed concrete has been widely used in infrastructure construction and poses new challenges to design and modelling. This paper investigates the behaviour of foamed concrete with the help of X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT), which is capable of characterising the microstructure of foamed concrete. An in situ compressive test-XCT scan is carried out to observe the failure mechanism of foamed concrete by XCT when subjected to compression load. A meso-scale simulation based on XCT images is conducted to simulate the behaviour of foamed concrete. An algorithm that directly reconstructs the meso-scale model from XCT images is developed. The experimental and numerical results show that foamed concrete exhibits a significant change in mechanical behaviour; it is less brittle compared to the response of dense samples. However, the reduction in the level of brittleness is accompanied by a significant decrease in compressive strength. Failure development inside samples is successfully captured by the XCT scan and the meso-scale modelling. The topology of foamed structures, in particular the chain of interconnected pores, influences the failure mechanism of foamed concrete. The combination of XCT scan and mesa-scale modelling provides a comprehensive framework to understand the mechanical behaviour of foamed concrete. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据