4.7 Article

Assessment of Na2SiO3 to NaOH ratio impact on the performance of polypropylene fiber-reinforced geopolymer composites

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 904-911

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.032

关键词

Geopolymer concrete; Metakaolin; Polypropylene fiber; Concrete durability; Monomer ratios; Microstructure properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this project is to build and use a concrete with minimum irritating impacts on the environment, reasonable price and optimal properties. Geopolymer concrete is new class of mineral binder that due to the high durability, very low energy consumption, very low CO2 emission, low investment cost and also special properties, is distinguished of other mineral binder such as Portland cement. In this study, after construction of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete containing 0.3, 0.5 and 1% polypropylene (PP) fibers with monomer ratios of 2, 2.5 and 3, engineering properties including compressive strength, flexural strength, displacement, Si/Al ratio, water absorption and electrical resistivity were assessed. Microstructural and structural changes of geopolymers as a result of lead addition/immobilization were evaluated via scanning electron microscopic (SEM) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) tests. The obtained results showed that using PP fiber in geopolymer samples increased the flexural strength by 28%. Furthermore, as evidenced by XRD diffractogram, the compressive strength improved by increasing the SS/SH ratio due to the formation of crystalline nepheline in the geopolymer specimens. In addition, images of electron microscopy of hardened geopolymer paste confirmed the remarkable increase in the density and uniformity of polymer products in the presence of suitable monomer ratios. In general, it is reported that using 1% PP fibers along with the sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio of 3 had an acceptable outcome in improving geopolymer concrete performance from point of view of environmentally, structurally and economically. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据