4.7 Article

Implementation of modified pull-off test by UTM to investigate bonding characteristics of bitumen and basic oxygen furnace slag (BOP)

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.083

关键词

Basic oxygen furnace slag; Bonding characteristic; Modified pull-off test; Fracture energy

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013AA031602]
  2. Wuhan Planning Project of Science and Technology from Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau [2013010803010370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modified pull-off tests were implemented to investigate the bonding characteristics of bitumen and basic oxygen furnace slag by Universal Test Machine. Sandwich-like samples were prepared, which consist of two aggregate cubes and one layer of bitumen film. Therefore a stone-bitumen-stone structure was realized under pull-off strength in Universal Test Machine with a special designed clamp. The experimental variables included three aggregate sources (basic oxygen furnace slag, basalt, and granite), two bitumen film thicknesses, three test temperatures and moisture treatment. During test the pull-off strengths were measured when samples were subjected to various experimental conditions. By means of reliability analysis, the modified pull-off test was validated as a test procedure of good reproducibility for routine use. Stronger pull-off strength can be observed between basic oxygen furnace slag and bitumen at various bitumen film thicknesses, temperatures and even in moisture condition. Temperature dominates the fracture type of aggregate and bitumen, which is also related remarkably to bitumen retained area on aggregate. Generally there i a decrease trend in pull-off strength as increase in temperature and bitumen film thickness. The results are in accord with fracture energies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据