4.7 Article

Mechanical behaviour and micro-structure of cement-stabilised marine clay with a metakaolin agent

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 51-57

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.041

关键词

Metakaolin (MK); Cement-stabilised clay; Unconfined compression strength; Secant modulus; Microstructure evolution

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51378117, 41330641]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Water Conservancy and Water Carriage Engineering, Ministry of Education [SLK2012B01]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [2242014R30020]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metakaolin, a fine powder material, has been widely used as an effective additive to produce the high-performance concrete since 1990s, for its high efficiency and relatively low price. However, metakaolin has rarely been attempted in admixtures of cement-stabilised soft clays until presently. This paper focuses on the macro-strength and micro-structure development of cement-stabilized Lianyungang marine clay mixed with metakaolin. The results show that the unconfined compression strengths of cemented soils containing 3% and 5% MM are approximately 2.0-3.0 times of that of materials without MM, that is MK can effectively improve the quality of cemented soils. Additionally, the strength with MM after 7 day's curing periods is approximately 0.87 times of that after 28 day's, while this ratio is 0.58 for the soils lacking MM, which indicates that the cemented soils containing MM show sufficient earlier strength than those lacking MM. Finally, the microstructure analysis reveals that MM mainly changes the pore volume distribution, which ranges between 0.01 mu m and 1 mu m, and produces more CSH/Aft/CASH bonding and fissures due to the secondary hydration and pozzolanic reactions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据