4.7 Article

Hydration process of the aluminate 12CaO•7Al2O3-assisted Portland cement-based solidification/stabilization of sewage sludge

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 675-681

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.049

关键词

Sewage sludge; Solidification/stabilization; Modifier; Ettringite; Leaching test

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08 DZ 1202802, 09DZ 1204105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high organic content in sewage sludge is the main obstacle to Portland cement-based solidification/stabilization (S/S). A novel aluminate 12CaO center dot 7Al(2)O(3) was prepared as accelerator in order to improve the performance of cement-based S/S making the sludge disposal and recycling possible. The behavior of pastes fabricated with various mass ratios of aluminate/cement has been analyzed in terms of mechanical strength, hydration products, microstructure and leaching characteristics. The incorporation of aluminate significantly improved the cement-based S/S performance. The solid matrix obtained with the aluminate/cement ratio of 4/6 and binder addition of 10 wt.% presented 28 day-strength of 157.2 kPa, in contrast, 25.1 kPa or so obtained for the cement only-sludge mix. X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis revealed that the presence of aluminate counteracted the interference from organic matters, favored the formation of crystalline phases viz. ettringite C(6)A (S) over bar H-3(32), calcite CaCO3 and quartz, and therefore the strength development. Environmental assessment of the final products in compliance leaching tests demonstrated that the concentration of heavy metals were below the certain legal limits (GB 5085.3-2007) set in China, though the addition of aluminate slightly fell the resistance of solidified mortars to acidic environments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据