4.7 Article

Effect of pre-heating duration and temperature conditioning on the rheological properties of bitumen

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 2785-2792

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.058

关键词

Bitumen; Rheology; Polymer; Complex modulus; Black diagram

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that overheating asphalt bitumen can lead to oxidation and stiffening. While heating bitumen is an essential protocol in sample preparation, it is important to identify the oven setting time and temperature for lab testing. Current AASHTO standards do not specify exact oven settings for bitumen sample preparation prior to laboratory testing. This study is evaluating the effect of oven heating duration and pouring temperature during sample preparation in the rheological properties of neat and polymer-modified bitumen (PMB). Rheological properties are measured using Rotational Viscometer, Dynamic Shear Rheometer and Bending Beam Rheometer at grade-specific testing temperatures. A neat bitumen PG64-22 and two PMB PG70-22 and 76-22 in un-aged (original) and aged conditions were tested at two temperatures: 143 degrees C and 185 degrees C for 1/2,2 and 4 h. The effect of short-term aging by rolling thin film oven was also investigated. To investigate the rheological properties over a wide range of temperatures, temperature sweep testing was conducted from 35 degrees C to 110 degrees C at a 10 rad/s frequency. The results suggest that there was no significant difference in the viscosity, complex modulus and creep stiffness for the tested bitumen. The RTFO aging index, absolute drop of complex viscosity and temperature aging indices were used to evaluate the bitumen preparation settings. The study recommends using the 143 degrees C and 2-h heating for proper preparation prior to standard lab testing. The study also investigated the aging influence in rheological properties for neat and PMB using the black diagram, DSR function map, and critical-stiffness temperature. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据