4.7 Article

Experimental study of the effect of fines content on dynamic compaction grouting in completely decomposed granite of Hong Kong

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 1249-1264

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.002

关键词

Dynamic compact grouting; Fines content; Shear strength; optimum water content; Soil improvement

资金

  1. Government of Hong Kong [9040593, CityU 1178/03E]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP0881238]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0881238] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper addresses the effects of fines contents on the mechanical behavior of CDG (completely decomposed granite) during dynamic compaction grouting. The first set of tests involved adding different amounts of kaolin clay into CDG to study the effects of fines contents on the compaction characteristics, permeability, consolidation behavior and shear strength of soils. It is found that, as the fines content increases, the dry density decreases, however the optimum water content increases. In addition. the permeability decreases due to reduction of void ratio, and the coefficient of consolidation increases with higher fines content. Furthermore, with increasing fines contents. the shear stress tends to be constant after it reaches the peak strength. However, when reaching the peak value, the shear stress reduces with further adding of fines content. In the second set of tests, the dynastic compaction grouting tests are carried out to study the effect of fines content on the compaction efficiency of Hong Kong CDG. It is found that, the compaction efficiency increases with increasing fines content, and reaches the peak compaction efficiency when the fines content reaches 6%, and then the compaction efficiency drops abruptly from a peak value of 0.55-0.25 when the fines content increases from 6% to 8%. However, when the fines content increases from 8% to 41%, the compaction efficiency decreases very slowly. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据