4.7 Article

Preparation of load-bearing building materials from autoclaved phosphogypsum

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 687-693

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.011

关键词

Phosphogypsum; Building materials; Re-crystallization; Autoclaved; Solid wastes

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [2004842073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have been carried out on calcined phosphogypsum (PG) for making the building materials. The present study was focused on autoclaved PG and its use in making load-bearing wall bricks. Autoclaved PG was prepared from original waste PG with steam pre-treatment. The crystalline phase, morphology, and thermal characteristics of original waste PG and autoclaved PG were investigated by XRD, SEM, and SDT. Then bricks of the size of Chinese standard brick were prepared from different types of PG in the PG-fly ash-lime-sand system. Results showed that the compressive strength of bricks from autoclaved PG by lower-pressure steam of 0.12 MPa, 120 degrees C for 16 h was much higher. The flexural strength and compressive strength of the bricks could reach 4.0 MPa and 15.0 MPa, respectively. The durability of the bricks was investigated by 15 freezing-thawing cycles at temperatures from -20 degrees C to 20 degrees C, and the weight loss was only 0.029% after all of cycles. Hemihydrates (CaSO4 center dot 0.5H(2)O) were dehydrated products from dihydrates in original PG with lower-pressure steam treatment, and hemihydrates were susceptible to absorbing the humidity and were transformed into densified re-crystallization gypsum (CaSO4 center dot 2H(2)O) that contributed to the final strength of bricks. Microstructural characteristics of bricks were investigated by XRD end SEM. Tobermorite was the significant hydrated product, which contributed to the strength of bricks. The use of autoclaved PG for making load-bearing wall bricks was recommended instead of conventional burnt clay bricks. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据