4.6 Review

Producer-Level Benefits of Sustainability Certification

期刊

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1176-1185

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01774.x

关键词

ecocertification; ecolabel; human-dominated landscape; ecocertificacion; eco-etiquetas; paisaje dominado por humanos

资金

  1. United Nations Environment Program in cooperation
  2. Science and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) of the Global Environment Facility
  3. Swedish Research Council Formas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Initiatives certifying that producers of goods and services adhere to defined environmental and social-welfare production standards are increasingly popular. According to proponents, these initiatives create financial incentives for producers to improve their environmental, social, and economic performance. We reviewed the evidence on whether these initiatives have such benefits. We identified peer-reviewed, ex post, producer-level studies in economic sectors in which certification is particularly prevalent (bananas, coffee, fish products, forest products, and tourism operations), classified these studies on the basis of whether their design and methods likely generated credible results, summarized findings from the studies with credible results, and considered how these findings might guide future research. We found 46 relevant studies, most of which focused on coffee and forest products and examined fair-trade and Forest Stewardship Council certification. The methods used in 11 studies likely generated credible results. Of these 11 studies, nine examined the economic effects and two the environmental effects of certification. The results of four of the 11 studies, all of which examined economic effects, showed that certification has producer-level benefits. Hence, the evidence to support the hypothesis that certification benefits the environment or producers is limited. More evidence could be generated by incorporating rigorous, independent evaluation into the design and implementation of projects promoting certification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据