4.3 Article

Weft-knitted silk-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) mesh scaffold combined with collagen matrix and seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for rabbit Achilles tendon repair

期刊

CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 1, 页码 25-34

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/03008207.2014.976309

关键词

Achilles tendon; bombyx mori silk; collagen; mesenchymal stem cells; poly(lactide-co-glycolide); weft-knitting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071467]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY13H060004]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Key Medical Science Subject Cluster Project of China (Biological Medicine Subject Cluster) [XKQ-010-001]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project of China [2013F10006]
  5. Platform Key Project of Zhejiang Provincial Medical Science and Technology Project of China [2014ZDA005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural silk fibroin fiber scaffolds have excellent mechanical properties, but degrade slowly. In this study, we used poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA, 10:90) fibers to adjust the overall degradation rate of the scaffolds and filled them with collagen to reserve space for cell growth. Silk fibroin-PLGA (36:64) mesh scaffolds were prepared using weft-knitting, filled with type I collagen, and incubated with rabbit autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). These scaffold-cells composites were implanted into rabbit Achilles tendon defects. At 16 weeks after implantation, morphological and histological observations showed formation of tendon-like tissues that expressed type I collagen mRNA and a uniformly dense distribution of collagen fibers. The maximum load of the regenerated Achilles tendon was 58.32% of normal Achilles tendon, which was significantly higher than control group without MSCs. These findings suggest that it is feasible to construct tissue engineered tendon using weft-knitted silk fibroin-PLGA fiber mesh/collagen matrix seeded with MSCs for rabbit Achilles tendon defect repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据