4.4 Article

The antiradical activity of some selected flavones and flavonols. Experimental and quantum mechanical study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-015-2848-1

关键词

Antioxidants; Density functional theory; Flavones; Flavonols; Minimal hydrogen abstraction energy

资金

  1. Wroclaw Medical University [ST-577]
  2. Foundation of Wroclaw Medical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to examine the antiradical and antioxidant activity of some flavones and flavonols with different models of hydroxylation and methoxylation. Antiradical activity was measured using ABTS and DPPH radicals and ferric ions (FRAP test). The reduction potential of the compounds was also investigated by determination of minimal hydrogen abstraction energy for each of the hydroxyl hydrogens of all compounds using quantum chemistry methods. Quercetin appeared to be a strong antioxidant when the FRAP test was performed and the strongest for ABTS and DPPH tests whereas genkwanin was the weakest antioxidant for three tests (FRAP, ABTS, and DPPH). Flavonols appeared to have much stronger antiradical activity than flavones. An exception was luteolin, which belongs to flavones but exhibited antiradical activity comparable to that of flavonols, probably due to the presence of a hydroxyl group in the B ring at the 3' position next to another hydroxyl group at position 4'. The study using UB3LYP/6-31G(d,p) model chemistry of density functional theory (DFT) showed the lowest hydrogen abstraction energy (HAE) for the hydroxyl group situated at 3' or 5' of myricetin. Based on the experimental results and computational studies, we conclude that the hydroxyl group situated at 4' in the B ring in flavonoids, and to a lesser at the 3' and 3 position in flavonols is the most important for antioxidant activity of flavonoids. We observe strong negative Spearman's rank order correlations between minimal HAE and antiradical activity of flavonoids in all three tests and double-tailed rejection P values are less than 0.001.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据