4.3 Article

CAROTENOIDS IN THE SEMINAL FLUID OF WILD BIRDS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN FAIRY-WRENS

期刊

CONDOR
卷 110, 期 4, 页码 694-700

出版社

COOPER ORNITHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2008.8604

关键词

antioxidants; carotenoid pigments; Malurus; oxidative stress; sexual competence; sperm; sperm competition

资金

  1. University of Chicago (MR)
  2. School of Life Sciences and College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at Arizona State University (KJM)
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [0964826] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male secondary sexual characters can provide females with information regarding the fertilizing capacity of a male's sperm. In some fishes and birds, intense nuptial coloration is correlated with male fertilizing capacity, but no mechanistic link between coloration and sperm quality has been established. One plausible mechanism is that carotenoid pigments, which color skin and feathers in many animals, are present in seminal fluid and serve as antioxidant protectors of sperm. We used high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to analyze sperm samples from four species of Australian fairy-wren (Malurus) and detected low concentrations (<1 mu g ml(-1)) of carotenoids in some samples. Xanthophyll carotenoids (including lutein and zeaxanthin), which are typically dietary in origin, were present in the seminal fluid of Superb (M. cyaneus) and Splendid (M. splendens) Fairy-Wrens. In contrast, red ketocarotenoids (including astaxanthin and canthaxanthin), which are likely metabolically derived from dietary precursors, were present in the seminal fluid of Red-backed Fairy-Wrens (M. melanocephalus). This work is the first to report carotenoids in avian seminal fluid and suggests that, although carotenoids are at low levels and thus may have limited antioxidant activity, there may be biological variability in avian semen carotenoids on which selection could act.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据