4.3 Article

GOLDEN-CHEEKED WARBLER NEST MORTALITY AND PREDATORS IN URBAN AND RURAL LANDSCAPES

期刊

CONDOR
卷 110, 期 3, 页码 458-466

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1525/cond.2008.8473

关键词

Austin; Dendroica chrysoparia; Fort Hood; Golden-cheeked Warbler; nest predators; urban; video cameras

资金

  1. The Nature Conservancy
  2. City of Austin biologists
  3. USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station
  4. Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit (U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Department of Conservation, University of Missouri, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Predation is a major cause of nest failure for songbirds, yet information is lacking on the relative importance of predator species in different landscapes. We identified nest predators of Golden-cheeked Warblers (Dendroica chrysoparia) in an urban landscape, compared cause-specific mortality rates between urban and rural landscapes, and evaluated whether monitoring nests with cameras affected nest survival. We monitored 68 nests with cameras in Austin, Texas, during 2005, 2006, and 2008 to identify causes of mortality, including predators, in an urban landscape. The period mortality and predation rates were 0.60 (95% CI: 0.42-0.73) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.68), respectively. We identified predators at 20 nests: Texas rat snakes (Elaphe obsoleta lindheimerii) depredated eight nests (40%), Western Scrub-Jays (Aphelocoma californica) depredated six (30%), Cooper's Hawks (Accipter cooperii) depredated two (10%), fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) depredated three (15%), and fire ants (Solenopsis sp.) depredated one nest (5%). We compared mortality rates, predation rates, and predators of the 68 camera-monitored nests in Austin to 74 nests monitored with cameras in the rural landscape of Fort Hood, Texas, during 1997-2002 and 2005. The period mortality rate (0.63, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75), predation rate (0.59, 95% CI: 0.45- 0.73), and predator composition at Fort Hood were similar to those in Austin. Nest abandonment, hatching success, and nestling survival were also similar in both landscapes. We compared nest survival of the 68 camera-monitored nests to 62 active nests monitored without video cameras in Austin, period nest survival was slightly higher for camera-monitored nests (0.40, 95% CI: 0.22-0.58) than for nests without cameras (0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.54).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据