4.7 Article

Dynamic model-based recommendations increase the precision and sustainability of N fertilization in midwestern US maize production

期刊

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 256-265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.08.010

关键词

Adapt-N; MRTN; Sustainable N management; Maize; Crop modelling

资金

  1. Walton Family Foundation [2013-1219]
  2. McKnight Foundation [13-060]
  3. USDA-NRCS (2010 CIG) [69-3A75-10-157]
  4. USDA-AFRI [2013-51130-21490]
  5. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future (ACSF) at Cornell University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The US Midwest encompasses one of the largest intensive maize (Zea mays L.) production environments in the world. Managing these lands in a more sustainable way is essential to reducing environmental stresses. This study explores the potential of Adapt-N, a dynamic biogeochemical model, to more precisely manage N inputs compared to a static N management approach, the Maximum Return to N (MRTN). Data from 16 multiple N rate trials conducted over two years (2013-2014) in three Midwest states were used to reconstruct two yield response functions: quadratic (QD) and linear-plateau (LP), allowing estimation of the Economic Optimal N Rate (EONR), and yields resulting from Adapt-N and MRTN recommendations. Model-based N rates were better correlated with the EONR based on the LP function, and were similar based on the QD function. Applying a dynamic approach to N recommendations allowed a significant reduction in applied N (averaging 28 kg ha(-1); 13%) without compromising yield, thereby maintaining farmer's profits while reducing simulated environmental N losses. Longer-term simulations showed that the largest reductions in N rates by Adapt-N compared to the MRTN occurred in dry seasons when early season N losses were small. This study shows that model-based N recommendations can have both economic and environmental benefits compared to a static N management approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据