4.7 Article

Automated system developed to control pH and concentration of nutrient solution evaluated in hydroponic lettuce production

期刊

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 53-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.02.006

关键词

Automated system; pH; Conductivity and hydroponic lettuce

资金

  1. Araucaria Foundation
  2. PROP-PG/UEL/ProDiCi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lettuce is one of the most widely consumed leaf vegetables. In hydroponic the growth depends upon the composition of nutrient solution. Due to its nutrient absorption, the conductivity and pH suffer continuous variations. This paper describes the development of a system completely managed by a lab-made software. It monitors the conductivity and pH throughout 24 h during the whole cycle of production. Also, allows adjust automatically any variation, through solenoid valves which dispense solutions of acid/base or nutrient. The efficiency of the proposed instrumentation was evaluated by simultaneously cultivation of same kind of lettuce (Vanda) in two different ways, hydroponics in greenhouse controlled with the developed devices, and grown conventionally in soil, adopted as referential. Agronomic and chemical parameters of commercial interest were analyzed for both crop, attesting the precocity in harvest (64 against 71 days) with reduced labor, better control and higher productivity, especially in fresh and dry matter of aerial parts, presenting 267.56 and 13.33 g plant(-1) respectively, using the developed system. The data sequence regarding the concentration of nutrients for the automated hydroponic system was similar to those obtained by the mentioned researchers, as follows: K > N > Ca > F > Mg > S > Fe > Zn > Mn > Cu. This similarity highlights the efficiency of controlling the parameters of conductivity and pH in the instrumental system applied to hydroponics, offering the producer an effective and viable alternative in the production of lettuce. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据