4.7 Article

Efficacy of unmodified and chemically modified Swietenia mahagoni shells for the removal of hexavalent chromium from simulated wastewater

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 487-497

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.06.033

关键词

Hexavalent chromium; Activated carbon; Swietenia mahagoni shell; Adsorption; Isotherms; Thermodynamic parameters

资金

  1. Research Council for Engineering and Technology Programmes
  2. Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, India [ETP/02/2014/KSCSTE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shell of Swietenia mahagoni was modified using sulfuric acid and ortho-phosphoric add to improve the adsorption capacity for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions. The adsorbent characterization was done by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The adsorption of Cr(VI) using RSMS, SSMS and PSMS was investigated as a function of solution pH, adsorbent dosage, contact time, initial metal concentration and temperature in batch studies. The adsorption equilibrium data were well studied for adsorption isotherm models, kinetic models and thermodynamics. The adsorption data better followed the Langmuir model rather than the other models studied. An appreciable increase in the adsorption capacities of SSMS (47.61 mg/g) and PSMS (58.82 mg/g), was observed compared to RSMS (37.03 mg/g). The adsorption kinetic data were best described by a pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Thermodynamic parameters revealed the spontaneous, endothermic and increased randomness nature of the Cr(VI) adsorption process. Desorption analysis was performed with 0.1, 0.5 and 1 M concentrations of NaOH solutions. The results of the present study illustrated that RSMS, SSMS and PSMS can be used as effective adsorbents for the removal of hexavalent chromium from an aqueous system. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据