4.7 Article

Optimization strategies for non-linear material parameters identification in metal forming problems

期刊

COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES
卷 89, 期 1-2, 页码 246-255

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.10.002

关键词

Inverse problems; Parameter identification; Gradient-based algorithms; Evolutionary algorithms; Optimization strategies

资金

  1. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia
  2. [SFRH/BD/45588/2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quality of Finite Element Analysis (FEM) results relies on the input data, such as the material constitutive models. In order to achieve the best material parameters for the material constitutive models assumed a priori to represent the material, parameter identification inverse problems are considered. These inverse problems attempt to lead to the most accurate results with respect to physical experiments, i.e. minimizing the difference between experimental and numerical results. In this work three constitutive models were considered, namely, a non-linear elastic-plastic hardening model, a hyperelastic model -more specifically the Ogden model- and an elasto-viscoplastic model with isotropic and kinematic work-hardening. For the determination of the best suited material parameter set, two different optimization algorithms were used: (i) the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, which is gradient-based and (ii) a real search-space evolutionary algorithm (EA). The robustness and efficiency of classical single-stage optimization methods can be improved with new optimization strategies. Strategies such as cascade, parallel and hybrid approaches are analysed in detail. In hybrid strategies, cascade and parallel approaches are integrated. These strategies were implemented and analysed for the material parameters determination of the above referred material constitutive models. It was observed that the developed strategies lead to better values of the objective function when compared with the single-stage optimizers. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据