4.4 Article

Diagnostic Performance of a Cytokine and IFN-γ-Induced Chemokine mRNA Assay after Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific Antigen Stimulation in Whole Blood from Infected Individuals

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 90-99

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.08.005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interferon (IFN)-gamma release assays have Limited sensitivity and cannot differentiate between active tuberculosis (TB) disease and latent TB infection (LTBI). Numerous cytokines and regulator factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis and control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Additional cytokines and chemokines associated with M. tuberculosis infection may improve the performance of IFN-gamma release assays. We developed a real-time RT-PCR TaqMan assay for targeting levels of eight human targets [IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-10, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11] and evaluated the assay with three different study groups. Results showed that the sensitivity of INF-alpha, IL-2R, and CXCL10 in the active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) group was 96.43%, 96.43%, and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity of IL-2R and CXCL10 in the latent tuberculosis infection group was 86.36% and 81.82%, respectively. Statistical results showed that TNF-alpha and CXCL9 were the best individual markers for differentiating between the PTB, LTBI, and non-TB groups. For optimal sensitivity and differentiation of M. tuberculosis infection status, the simultaneous detection of multiple targets was attempted. The combination of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-2R, and the combination of TNF-alpha, IL-2R, CXCL9, and CXCL10 showed the best performance for detecting active PTB (both 100% positivity) and LTBI (86.36% and 81.82% positivity, respectively). These results imply that the combination of suitable markers is useful in efficiently diagnosing TB and differentiating M. tuberculosis infection status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据