4.0 Article

Biochemical and molecular characterization of laccase isoforms produced by the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor under submerged culture conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 339-347

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2015.10.009

关键词

Biochemical characterization; Laccase isoform diversity; Trametes versicolor; Molecular characterization

资金

  1. PROMEP project [103.5/07/2674]
  2. CONACYT (Mexico) [CVU 349655]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many fungi produce several laccase isoenzymes endowed with different catalytic properties, however, the physiological significance of this multiplicity is still unclear. Multiple laccase isoforms produced by the same organism imply a greater flexibility and/or adaptation to constantly changing environments. In this study, we explore and discuss the laccase isoform diversity of Trametes versicolor under submerged culture conditions. Oak sawdust was used as a natural, abundant and cheap source of laccase inducers. Two laccase bands (Icc1 and Icc2) were detected by SDS-PAGE zymography. Lcc2 exhibited an apparent molecular mass of 100 kDa, and was purified to its characteristic blue color for biochemical characterization. Lcc2 displayed high affinities toward all the substrates used in this study (0.01 +/- 0.0043, 0.5 +/- 0.053, 2.23 +/- 0.53 and 3.77 +/- 0.85 mM, for ABTS, DMP,GUA and SYR, respectively). Isoelectric focusing analysis of this band revealed the presence of 5 distinct laccase isoforms. The suggested existence of different laccase heterodimers in Icc2 may have had an influence on its catalyzing capacity. Laccase isoform diversity was corroborated by molecular characterization of 5 allelic mRNA sequences. Multiple alignment analysis, 3-dimensional mapping and theoretical sequence-structure-function assumptions suggests that the newly characterized alleles would most likely display diversity in their biochemical behavior if functionally expressed. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据