4.7 Article

An effective hybrid tabu search algorithm for multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problems

期刊

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 647-662

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.014

关键词

Flexible job-shop scheduling problem; Multi-objective optimization; Variable neighborhood search; Public critical block; Tabu search

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [60874075, 70871065]
  2. Science Research and Development of Provincial Department of Public Education of Shandong [J08LJ20, J09LG29, J08LJ59]
  3. Soft Science Foundation of Shandong [2009REB125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an effective hybrid tabu search algorithm (HTSA) to solve the flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Three minimization objectives - the maximum completion time (makespan), the total workload of machines and the workload of the critical machine are considered simultaneously. In this study, a tabu search (TS) algorithm with an effective neighborhood structure combining two adaptive rules is developed, which constructs improved local search in the machine assignment module. Then, a well-designed left-shift decoding function is defined to transform a solution to an active schedule. In addition, a variable neighborhood search (VNS) algorithm integrating three insert and swap neighborhood structures based on public critical block theory is presented to perform local search in the operation scheduling component. The proposed HTSA is tested on sets of the well-known benchmark instances. The statistical analysis of performance comparisons shows that the proposed HTSA is superior to four existing algorithms including the AL + CGA algorithm by Kacem, Hammadi, and Borne (2002b), the PSO + SA algorithm by Xia and Wu (2005), the PSO + TS algorithm by Zhang, Shao, Li, and Gao (2009), and the Xing's algorithm by Xing. Chen, and Yang (2009a) in terms of both solution quality and efficiency. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据