4.2 Article

Promotional effect of Ce on Cu-SAPO-34 monolith catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
卷 398, 期 -, 页码 304-311

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2014.12.020

关键词

Cu-SAPO-34; Hydrothermal stability; Cerium; NH3-SCR; Isolated Cu2+ ion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21173153]
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China [2013AA065304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity and hydrothermal stability of Cu-SAPO-34 and CuCe-SAPO-34 for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia (NH3-SCR) were investigated systematically. The catalysts were prepared by wet-impregnation method, and characterized by N-2 adsorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS), Ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectrum (UV-vis-DRS), H-2-temperature programmed reduction (H-2-TPR) and NH3-temperature programmed desorption (NH3-TPD). The experimental results of fresh catalysts suggested that Ce mainly existed on the surface of the catalyst and was well dispersed in the form of Ce3+, and its interaction with copper could improve the dispersion of copper species and increase the amount of isolated Cu2+ ions, so that CuCe-SAPO-34 performed better NH3-SCR activity than Cu-SAPO-34. After hydrothermal aging at 800 degrees C for 12 h, the characterization results indicated that the introduction of cerium effectively improved the textural and structural stability of SAPO-34 since more cations at the exchange site of SAPO-34 could decrease the concentration of Si O(H) Al bond which was closely related to the damage of the SAPO-34 framework. Moreover, the addition of Ce could prevent the decrease of acid densities, promote the redistribution of CuO during hydrothermal aging and provide higher amount of isolated Cu2+ ions, leading to superior hydrothermal stability of CuCe-SAPO-34 catalyst. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据