4.7 Article

A multi-species reactive transport model to estimate biogeochemical rates based on single-well push-pull test data

期刊

COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 997-1004

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.04.001

关键词

Push-pull test; Pump test; Inverse modeling; Microbial processes; Dispersion; Reaction; Sorption; In situ rate estimation; PPTEST; Mobile-immobile

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Biocomplexity in the Environment [EAR-0418488/0935625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Push-pull tests are a popular technique to investigate various aquifer properties and microbial reaction kinetics in situ. Most previous studies have interpreted push-pull test data using approximate analytical solutions to estimate (generally first-order) reaction rate coefficients. Though useful, these analytical solutions may not be able to describe important complexities in rate data. This paper reports the development of a multi-species, radial coordinate numerical model (PPTEST) that includes the effects of sorption, reaction lag time and arbitrary reaction order kinetics to estimate rates in the presence of mixing interfaces such as those created between injected push water and native aquifer water. The model has the ability to describe an arbitrary number of species and user-defined reaction rate expressions including Monod/Michelis-Menten kinetics. The FORTRAN code uses a finite-difference numerical model based on the advection-dispersion-reaction equation and was developed to describe the radial flow and transport during a push-pull test. The accuracy of the numerical solutions was assessed by comparing numerical results with analytical solutions and field data available in the literature. The model described the observed breakthrough data for tracers (chloride and iodide-131) and reactive components (sulfate and strontium-85) well and was found to be useful for testing hypotheses related to the complex set of processes operating near mixing interfaces. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据