4.5 Article

Numerical simulation of roughness effect on the stability of a hypersonic boundary layer

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 350-367

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.01.009

关键词

Hypersonic boundary layer; Roughness; Cut-cell method; Transition; Receptivity

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, USAF, under AFOSR [FA9550-07-1-0414]
  2. National Science Foundation [0933556]
  3. AFOSR/NASA National Center for Hypersonic Research in Laminar-Turbulent Transition
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0933556] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new high-order cut-cell method is used to numerically simulate two dimensional roughness effects on modal growth in a hypersonic boundary layer. The steady base flow is simulated first by solving the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Perturbations correspond to Mode S wave at 100 kHz and a wall normal velocity pulse with a continuous frequency spectrum up to 1 MHz are imposed onto the mean flow with roughness separately. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is used to decompose the perturbation and to study the evolution of perturbations at different frequencies. The number of roughness elements in the boundary layer is changed for two test cases. Moreover, the effect of roughness height is studied in the Mode S simulation. It is found that when the roughness element is located at the synchronization point of a particular frequency (i.e. synchronization frequency), perturbations at frequencies higher than the synchronization frequency are damped. On the other hand, perturbations at frequencies lower than the synchronization frequency are amplified by the roughness. The same conclusion is drawn in cases where the roughness location is changed. The relation between roughness and the synchronization point is a candidate to explain roughness delayed transition seen experimentally. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据