4.7 Article

Single Fibril Growth Kinetics of α-Synuclein

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 427, 期 6, 页码 1428-1435

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.01.020

关键词

protein aggregation; amyloid; fibril formation; Parkinson's disease; thioflavin T

资金

  1. Deutschlandstipendium
  2. Heinrich Heine International Graduate School of Protein Science and Technology (iGRASPseed)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative disorders associated with protein misfolding are fatal diseases that are caused by fibrillation of endogenous proteins such as alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn) in Parkinson's disease (PD) or amyloid-beta in Alzheimer's disease. Fibrils of alpha-syn are a major pathological hallmark of PD and certain aggregation intermediates are postulated to cause synaptic failure and cell death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. For the development of therapeutic approaches, the mechanistic understanding of the fibrillation process is essential. Here we report real-time observation of alpha-syn fibril elongation on a glass surface, imaged by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy using thioflavin T fluorescence. Fibrillation on the glass surface occurred in the same time frame and yielded fibrils of similar length as fibrillation in solution. Time-resolved imaging of fibrillation on a single fibril level indicated that a-syn fibril elongation follows a stop-and-go mechanism; that is, fibrils either extend at a homogenous growth rate or stop to grow for variable time intervals. The fibril growth kinetics were compatible with a model featuring two states, a growth state and a stop state, which were approximately isoenergetic and interconverted with rate constants of similar to 1.5 x 10(-4) s(-1). In the growth state, alpha-syn monomers were incorporated into the fibril with a rate constant of 8.6 x 10(3) M-1 s(-1). Fibril elongation of alpha-syn is slow compared to other amyloidogenic proteins. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据