4.5 Article

Direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulent channel flows using the discontinuous Galerkin method

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 47, 期 1, 页码 85-100

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.015

关键词

Direct numerical simulation; Discontinuous Galerkin method; Turbulent channel flow; Compressible flow; Mach number; Turbulence structures

资金

  1. NSERC Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flows between isothermal walls have been carried out using discontinuous Galerkin method. Three Mach numbers are considered (0.2, 0.7, and 1.5) at a fixed Reynolds number approximate to 2800, based on the bulk velocity, bulk density, half channel width, and dynamic viscosity at the wall. Power law and log-law with the scaling of the mean streamwise velocity are considered to study their performance on compressible flows and their dependence on Mach numbers. It indicates that power law seems slightly better and less dependent on Mach number than the log-law in the overlap region. Mach number effects on the second-order (velocity, pressure, density, temperature, shear stress, and vorticity fluctuations) and higher-order (skewness and flatness of velocity, pressure, density, and temperature fluctuations) statistics are explored and discussed. Both inner (that is wall variables) and outer (that is global) scalings (with Mach number) are considered. It is found that for some second-order statistics (i.e. velocity, density, and temperature), the outer scaling collapses better than the inner scaling. It is also found that near-wall large-scale motions are affected by Mach number. The near-wall spanwise streak spacing increases with increasing Mach number. Iso-surfaces of the second invariant of the velocity gradient tensor are more sparsely distributed and elongated as Mach number increases, which is similar to the distribution of near-wall low speed streaks. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据