4.7 Review

Nuclear Organization Changes and the Epigenetic Silencing of FLC during Vernalization

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 427, 期 3, 页码 659-669

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.08.025

关键词

vernalization; FLC; gene loop; epigenetic silencing

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K00008X/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Industry Strategy Panel [BB/J004588/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/K00008X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K00008X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in nuclear organization are considered an important complement to trans-acting factors, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs in robust and stable epigenetic silencing. However, how these multiple layers interconnect mechanistically to reinforce each other's activity is still unclear. A system providing long timescales facilitating analysis of these interconnections is vernalization. This involves the Polycomb-mediated epigenetic silencing of flowering locus C (FLC) that occurs as Arabidopsis plants are exposed to prolonged cold. Analysis of changes in nuclear organization during vernalization has revealed that disruption of a gene loop and physical clustering of FLC loci are part of the vernalization mechanism. These events occur at different times and thus contribute to distinct aspects of the silencing mechanism. The physical clustering of FLC loci is tightly correlated with the accumulation of specific Polycomb complexes/H3K27me3 at a localized intragenic site during the cold. Since the quantitative nature of vernalization is a reflection of a bistable cell autonomous switch in an increasing number of cells, this correlation suggests a tight connection between the switching mechanism and changes in nuclear organization. This integrated picture is likely to be informative for many epigenetic mechanisms. (c) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据