4.7 Article

Extended finite element method with edge-based strain smoothing (ESm-XFEM) for linear elastic crack growth

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.08.013

关键词

Fracture analysis; Numerical method; Edge-based smoothed finite element method; Extended finite element method; Stress intensity factor; Convergence rate

资金

  1. Royal Academy of Engineering
  2. Leverhulme Trust
  3. EPSRC [EP/G069352/1, EP/G042705/1]
  4. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  5. EPSRC [EP/G042705/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G042705/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a strain smoothing procedure for the extended finite element method (XFEM). The resulting edge-based smoothed extended finite element method (ESm-XFEM) is tailored to linear elastic fracture mechanics and, in this context, to outperform the standard XFEM. In the XFEM, the displacement-based approximation is enriched by the Heaviside and asymptotic crack tip functions using the framework of partition of unity. This eliminates the need for the mesh alignment with the crack and re-meshing, as the crack evolves. Edge-based smoothing (ES) relies on a generalized smoothing operation over smoothing domains associated with edges of simplex meshes, and produces a softening effect leading to a close-to-exact stiffness, super-convergence and ultra-accurate solutions. The present method takes advantage of both the ES-FEM and the XFEM. Thanks to the use of strain smoothing, the subdivision of elements intersected by discontinuities and of integrating the (singular) derivatives of the approximation functions is suppressed via transforming interior integration into boundary integration. Numerical examples show that the proposed method improves significantly the accuracy of stress intensity factors and achieves a near optimal convergence rate in the energy norm even without geometrical enrichment or blending correction. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据