4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A computational framework for fluid-solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
卷 198, 期 45-46, 页码 3583-3602

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.09.013

关键词

Artery; Stress; Remodeling; Fluid-solid interaction; Mechanobiology; Vascular homeostasis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL083800, R01 HL080415-04, R01 HL080415, R01 HL064372-05, R01 HL064372, P50 HL083800-010002] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [U54 GM072970] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P50HL083800, R01HL080415, R01HL064372] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [U54GM072970] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is now well known that altered hemodynamics can alter the genes that are expressed by diverse vascular cells, which in turn plays a critical role in the ability of a blood vessel to adapt to new biomechanical conditions and governs the natural history of the progression of many types of disease. Fortunately, when taken together, recent advances in molecular and cell biology, in vivo medical imaging, biomechanics, computational mechanics, and computing power provide an unprecedented opportunity to begin to understand such hemodynamic effects on vascular biology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Moreover, with increased understanding will come the promise of improved designs for medical devices and clinical interventions. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to present a new computational framework that brings together recent advances in computational biosolid and biofluid mechanics that can exploit new information on the biology of vascular growth and remodeling as well as in vivo patient-specific medical imaging so as to enable realistic simulations of vascular adaptations, disease progression, and clinical intervention. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据