4.4 Article

Bats like vintage: managing exotic eucalypt plantations for bat conservation in a Mediterranean landscape

期刊

ANIMAL CONSERVATION
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 53-64

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12216

关键词

Eucalyptus plantations; forest clutter; forest management; montado; non-native trees; Pipistrellus

资金

  1. Fundacao para Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/63885/2009, IF/00497/2013]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/63885/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transformation of native habitats into forest plantations for industrial purposes frequently has negative consequences for biodiversity. We evaluated the impact of eucalypt plantations on native bats in a Mediterranean area, taking Portugal as a case study. We compared the overall bat activity, species richness and Kuhl's bat Pipistrellus kuhlii (the most abundant bat species in the area) activity between eucalypt plantations and native montado habitat, and examined the influence of stand, landscape and survey variables within plantations on the response variables. A set of 11 plantation stands, three landscape and two survey variables were employed as predictor variables using a zero-inflated Poisson generalized linear mixed model. Hawking and generalist bats of the genus Pipistrellus were the most frequently detected species. Bat activity, species richness and P.kuhlii activity were higher in native montado than in any of the eucalypt stands. Mature eucalypt plantations showed the highest bat activity, while clear-cut areas showed the lowest. Generally, within eucalypt stands, complex high-level vegetation structure, from the ground level up to 3m high, and proximity to water points were associated with higher levels of bat and P.kuhlii activity and species richness. The results suggest that in order to promote bat diversity and activity in exotic eucalypt plantations in the Mediterranean region, it is important to provide a high density of water points, maintain plots of mature plantations and promote understorey clutter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据