期刊
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
卷 54, 期 12, 页码 3158-3167出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.02.017
关键词
Bayesian D-optimal designs; E(s(2))-optimal designs; Effect sparsity; Gauss-Dantzig selector; Main effects; Screening; Simulation
资金
- EPSRC
- Lubrizol Corporation
Various design and model selection methods are available for supersaturated designs having more factors than runs but little research is available on their comparison and evaluation. Simulated experiments are used to evaluate the use of E(s(2))-optimal and Bayesian D-optimal designs and to compare three analysis strategies representing regression, shrinkage and a novel model-averaging procedure. Suggestions are made for choosing the values of the tuning constants for each approach. Findings include that (i) the preferred analysis is via shrinkage; (ii) designs with similar numbers of runs and factors can be effective for a considerable number of active effects of only moderate size; and (iii) unbalanced designs can perform well. Some comments are made on the performance of the design and analysis methods when effect sparsity does not hold. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据