4.6 Article

Enhancing performance of particle swarm optimization through an algorithmic link with genetic algorithms

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 761-794

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-013-9605-0

关键词

Particle swarm optimization; Genetic algorithms; Real-parameter optimization; Unified algorithms; Algorithmic linking

资金

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing
  2. College of Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are emerging as competitive and reliable techniques for several optimization tasks. Juxtapositioning their higher-level and implicit correspondence; it is provocative to query if one optimization algorithm can benefit from another by studying underlying similarities and dissimilarities. This paper establishes a clear and fundamental algorithmic linking between particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and genetic algorithms (GAs). Specifically, we select the task of solving unimodal optimization problems, and demonstrate that key algorithmic features of an effective Generalized Generation Gap based Genetic Algorithm can be introduced into the PSO by leveraging this algorithmic linking while significantly enhance the PSO's performance. However, the goal of this paper is not to solve unimodal problems, neither is to demonstrate that the modified PSO algorithm resembles a GA, but to highlight the concept of algorithmic linking in an attempt towards designing efficient optimization algorithms. We intend to emphasize that the evolutionary and other optimization researchers should direct more efforts in establishing equivalence between different genetic, evolutionary and other nature-inspired or non-traditional algorithms. In addition to achieving performance gains, such an exercise shall deepen the understanding and scope of various operators from different paradigms in Evolutionary Computation (EC) and other optimization methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据