4.5 Article

A Planar Thin-Film Peltier Cooler for the Thermal Management of a Dew-Point Sensor System

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 990-996

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2367103

关键词

In-plane thin-film Peltier cooler; dew-point sensor; Sb/BiSb thermoelectric material combination; freestanding membrane; thermal management

资金

  1. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Industrieller Forschungseinrichtungen through CoMem Project [15051-BG]
  2. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung through NanoTau Project [16SV5347]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of new application fields of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) devices often implies a high degree of complexity and the integration of several functionalities within these devices. In this paper, thermoelectric planar thin-film microcoolers become more and more important due to their cooling and temperature stabilization ability, respectively, in MEMS devices. This paper reports on the investigation of the design, manufacturing, and characterization of a membrane-integrated thin-film thermoelectric cooling arrangement for active temperature control and precise local cooling of the sensitive region in a thin-film dew-point sensor. The sensor concept is based on the combination of a thermal sensor heater and a planar thin-film Peltier cooler, which are all arranged on a freestanding and thermally insulated membrane. To obtain a high performance concerning the maximum temperature decrease of the active-cooled membrane, a highly efficient thermoelectric materials combination of Sb and Bi0.87Sb0.13 was used for the fabrication of the in-plane Peltier configuration. For the first sensor setup, a temperature decrease of 10.6 K was achieved under atmospheric conditions at 293 K. In combination with an externally assembled two-stage Peltier cooler dew-point, temperature measurements down to 213 K (-60 degrees C) were performed in a climatic exposure test cabinet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据