4.5 Article

Verification of first-principles codes: Comparison of total energies, phonon frequencies, electron-phonon coupling and zero-point motion correction to the gap between ABINIT and QE/Yambo

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 341-348

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.11.031

关键词

Density functional perturbation theory; Electron-phonon coupling; Temperature dependence; Verification; Allen-Heine-Cardona theory; Zero-point motion renormalization; Diamond

资金

  1. FRS-FNRS through a FRIA grant
  2. MIUR FIRB Grant [RBFR12SW0J]
  3. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FRS-FNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the ever-increasing sophistication of codes, the verification of the implementation of advanced theoretical formalisms becomes critical. In particular, cross comparison between different codes provides a strong hint in favor of the correctness of the implementations, and a measure of the (hopefully small) possible numerical differences. We lead a rigorous and careful study of the quantities that enter in the calculation of the zero-point motion renormalization of the direct band gap of diamond due to electron-phonon coupling, starting from the total energy, and going through the computation of phonon frequencies and electron-phonon matrix elements. We rely on two independent implementations: Quantum Espresso + Yambo and ABINIT. We provide the order of magnitude of the numerical discrepancies between the codes, that are present for the different quantities: less than 10(-5) Ha per atom on the total energy (-5.722 Ha/at), less than 0.07 cm(-1) on the C; L; X phonon frequencies (555-1330 cm(-1)), less than 0.5% on the square of the electron-phonon matrix elements and less than 4 meV on the zero-point motion renormalization of each eigenenergies (44-264 meV). Within our approximations, the DFT converged direct band gap renormalization in diamond due to the electron-phonon coupling is -0.409 eV (reduction of the band gap). (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据