4.5 Article

Simulation of temperature distribution in single metallic powder layer for laser micro-sintering

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 333-339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.09.012

关键词

Laser micro-sintering; Simulation; Process parameter; Temperature distribution; Dimensions of molten pool

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [60878022]
  2. Key Laboratory of Chemical Laser [KLCL-HT-200907]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simulation of temperature distribution in single metallic powder layer for laser micro-sintering (LMS) using finite element analysis (FEA) has been proposed, taking into account the adoption of ANSYS mu MKS system of units, the transition from powder to solid and the utilization of moving laser beam power with a Gaussian distribution. By exploiting these characteristics a more accurate model could be achieved. The effects of the process parameters, such as laser beam diameter, laser power and laser scan speed on the temperature distribution and molten pool dimensions have been preliminarily investigated. It is shown that temperature increases with the laser power and decreases with the scan speed monotonously. For the laser beam diameter during single-track, the maximum temperature of the powder bed increases with the decrease in the laser beam diameter, but far from the center of the laser beam area, the temperature increases with the laser beam diameter. The molten pool dimensions in LMS are much less than that in classical selective laser sintering (SLS) process. Both molten pool length and width decrease with the laser beam diameter and the laser scan speed, but increase with the laser power. The molten pool length is always larger than the molten pool width. Furthermore, the center of molten pool is slightly shifted for the laser multi-track. (C) 2011 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据