4.4 Article

Stage: Stereotypical Trust Assessment Through Graph Extraction

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 72-101

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/coin.12046

关键词

trust and reputation; Semantic Web; graph mining

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory
  2. U.K. Ministry of Defence [W911NF-06-3-0001]
  3. U.S. Army Research Laboratory [W911NF-13-1-0243]
  4. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [113E238]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bootstrapping trust assessment where there is little or no evidence regarding a subject is a significant challenge for existing trust and reputation systems. When direct or indirect evidence is absent, existing approaches usually assume that all agents are equally trustworthy. This naive assumption makes existing approaches vulnerable to attacks such as Sybil and whitewashing. Inspired by real-life scenarios, we argue that malicious agents may share some common patterns or complex features in their descriptions. If such patterns or features can be detected, they can be exploited to bootstrap trust assessments. Based on this idea, we propose the use of frequent subgraph mining and state-of-the-art knowledge representation formalisms to estimate a priori trust for agents. Our approach first discovers significant patterns that may be used to characterize trustworthy and untrustworthy agents. Then, these patterns are used as features to train a regression model to estimate the trustworthiness of agents. Last, a priori trust for unknown agents (e.g., newcomers) is estimated using the discovered features based on the trained model. Through empirical evaluation, we show that the proposed approach significantly outperforms well-known trust approaches if trustworthiness of agents is correlated with patterns in their descriptions or social networks. Furthermore, we show that the proposed approach performs at least as good as the existing approaches if such correlations do not exist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据