4.5 Article

Using volcano plots and regularized-chi statistics in genetic association studies

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 77-83

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2013.02.003

关键词

Volcano plot; Regularized-chi; Genetic association analysis; Rare variants; SNPs; Type-2 diabetes

资金

  1. Robert S. Boas Center for Genomics and Human Genetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Labor intensive experiments are typically required to identify the causal disease variants from a list of disease associated variants in the genome. For designing such experiments, candidate variants are ranked by their strength of genetic association with the disease. However, the two commonly used measures of genetic association, the odds-ratio (OR) and p-value may rank variants in different order. To integrate these two measures into a single analysis, here we transfer the volcano plot methodology from gene expression analysis to genetic association studies. In its original setting, volcano plots are scatter plots of fold-change and t-test statistic (or -log of the p-value), with the latter being more sensitive to sample size. In genetic association studies, the OR and Pearson's chi-square statistic (or equivalently its square root, chi; or the standardized log(OR)) can be analogously used in a volcano plot, allowing for their visual inspection. Moreover, the geometric interpretation of these plots leads to an intuitive method for filtering results by a combination of both OR and chi-square statistic, which we term regularized-chi. This method selects associated markers by a smooth curve in the volcano plot instead of the rightangled lines which corresponds to independent cutoffs for OR and chi-square statistic. The regularized-chi incorporates relatively more signals from variants with lower minor-allele-frequencies than chi-square test statistic. As rare variants tend to have stronger functional effects, regularized-chi is better suited to the task of prioritization of candidate genes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据