4.5 Article

Prediction of Alzheimer's diagnosis using semi-supervised distance metric learning with label propagation

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 438-441

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2008.07.030

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Diagnosis; Semi-supervised learning; Distance metric learning; Label propagation

资金

  1. NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and leads to irreversible neurogenerative damage of the brain. However, the current diagnostic tools have poor sensitivity, especially for the early stages of AD and do not allow for diagnosis until AD has lead to irreversible brain damage. Therefore, it is crucial that AD is detected as early as possible. Although it is very hard, laborious and time-consuming to gather many AD and non-AD labeled samples, gathering unlabeled samples is easier than labeled samples. Since standard learning algorithms learn a diagnosis model from labeled samples only. they require many labeled samples and do not work well when the number of training samples is small. Therefore, it is very desirable to develop a predictive learning method to achieve high performance using both labeled samples and unlabeled samples. To address these problems, we propose semi-supervised distance metric learning using Random Forests with label propagation (SRF-LP) which incorporates labeled data for obtaining good metrics and propagates labels based on them. Experimental results showed that SRF-LP outperformed standard supervised learning algorithms, i.e., RF, SVM, Adaboost and CART and reached 93.1% accuracy at a maximum. Especially, SRF-LP largely outperformed when the number of training samples is very small. Our results also suggested that SRF-LP exhibits a synergistic effect of semi-supervised distance metric learning and label propagation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据