4.3 Article

Label-free, non-invasive light scattering sensor for rapid screening of Bacillus colonies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 56-66

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.12.012

关键词

Bacillus; Bacterial colony; BARDOT; Detection; Light scattering sensor; Screening

资金

  1. Agricultural Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture [1935-42000-072-02G]
  2. Center for Food Safety Engineering at Purdue University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacillus species are widely distributed in nature and have great significance both as industrially beneficial microbes and as public health burdens. We employed a novel light-scattering sensor, BARDOT (bacterial rapid detection using optical scattering technology) for instant screening of colonies of Bacillus species on agar plates. A total of 265 Bacillus and non-Bacillus isolates from our collection were used to develop and verify scatter image libraries including isolates from food, environmental and clinical samples. All Bacillus species (n = 118) were detected with a high positive predictive value, PPV (>= 90%)) while non-Bacillus spp. had very low PPV (<5%) when compared with scatter images from the library. Among all media tested for culturing, Bacillus colonies on phenol red mannitol (PRM) generated the highest differential scatter patterns and were used in subsequent studies. Surface plot analysis of scatter patterns confirmed differences for Bacillus and non-Bacillus isolates. BARDOT successfully detected Bacillus from inoculated baby formula, cheese, and naturally contaminated bovine unpasteurized milk in 7-16 h. Ten of 129 colonies (isolates) from seven milk samples were Bacillus and remainders were non-Bacillus spp. BARDOT results were confirmed by PCR and 16S rDNA sequencing. This study demonstrates that BARDOT could be used as a screening tool to identify relevant Bacillus colonies from a community prior to genome sequencing. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据