4.3 Article

Validation of reference genes for real-time quantitative RT-PCR studies in Talaromyces marneffei

期刊

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 118, 期 -, 页码 42-50

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.015

关键词

qRT-PCR; Talaromyces marneffei; Penicillium marneffei; Actin; Reference gene

资金

  1. National Research University Project under Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Talaromyces marneffei (or Penicillium marneffei) is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause disseminated disease in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, especially in Southeast Asia. T. marneffei is a thermally dimorphic fungus. Typically, T. marneffei has an adaptive morphology. It grows in a filamentous form (mould) at 25 degrees C and can differentiate to produce asexual spores (conidia). In contrast, at 37 degrees C, it grows as yeast cells that divide by fission. This study aimed to validate a quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for gene expression analysis in T. marneffei. Analysis of relative gene expression by qRT-PCR requires normalization of data using a proper reference gene. However, suitable reference genes have not been identified in gene expression studies across different cell types or under different experimental conditions in T. marneffei. In this study, four housekeeping genes were selected for analysis: beta-actin (act); glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapdh); beta-tubulin (benA) and 18S rRNA. Two analysis programs; BestKeeper and geNorm software tools were used to validate the expression of the candidate normalized genes. The results indicated that the actin gene was the one which was most stably expressed and was recommended for use as the endogenous control for gene expression analysis of all growth forms in T. marneffei by qRT-PCR under normal and stress conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据